Prior to 2006, a Pharma.D or a Doctorate in Pharmacy, was an optional course one could take to boost their credentials. It was introduced as a professional prerequisite back in 2006, and prior to this, Pharmacists only needed an RPh after their name for them to work as a pharmacist.īack then, a person need only go through a five-year bachelor’s degree program in Pharmacy –a B.S. Well, a Pharma.D is a relatively new degree, and a relatively new requirement, that the U.S. The two sound pretty much the same, and in a way, they are, so what makes them different? In the United States, one cannot become a licensed, professional Pharmacist without a Pharma.D.īut what about an RPh? RpH stands for Registered Pharmacist, and is also a professional degree that is required before a person can become a practicing pharmacist. It’s a professional degree that acts as a prerequisite for the practice of Pharmacy, similar to an MD. A Pharma.D refers to a Doctorate in Pharmacy. To understand the Marketing Director’s comment, we need to look at the difference between those three letters. Why would we hire RPh’s when we have all these Pharm.D in our staff? The Difference Between a Pharma.D and an RPh Degree That being said, the same marketing director did say something that bothered me I asked if how many RPh degree holders they have working in the company, and the man laughed. And rightfully so: achieving a Pharm.D is no easy feat, and a pharmaceutical company that has an army of Pharm.D touting employees can be sure that they’re staffed by subject matter experts. A few days ago, I was at a meeting with the marketing department of one of the top pharmaceutical companies in the country, and the marketing director was boasting about the amount of Pharm.D’s they have in their workforce.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |